Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1852
Heroes of the Exile
<"12">
XII
The Great Industrial Exhibition inaugurated a new
epoch in the Emigration. The great throng of German Philistines that flooded
into London during the summer, felt ill at ease in the bustle of the great
Crystal Palace and in the even larger town of London with its noise, its
din and its clamour. And when the toil and the labour of the day, the dutiful
inspection of the Exhibition and the other sights had been completed in
the sweat of his brow, the German Philistine could recover at his ease
with Schärttner at the Hanau or Göhringer at the Star, with their
beery cosiness, their smoke-filled fug and their public-house politics.
Here "the whole of the fatherland could be seen" and in addition all the
greatest men of Germany could be seen gratis. There they all sat, the members
of parliament, the deputies of Chambers, the generals, the Club orators
of the halcyon days of 1848 and 1849, they smoked their pipes just like
ordinary people and debated the loftiest interests of the fatherland day
after day, in public and with unshakeable dignity. This was the place where
for the price of a few bottles of extremely cheap wine the German citizen
could discover exactly what went on at the most secret meetings of the
European cabinets. This was the place where he could learn to within a
minute when "it would all start". In the meantime one bottle after another
was started and all the Parties went home unsteadily but strengthened in
the knowledge that they had made their contribution to the salvation of
the fatherland. Never has the Emigration drunk more and cheaper than during
the period when the solvent masses of German Philistines were in London.
The true organisation of the Emigration was in fact this tavern
organisation presided over by Silenus-Schärttner in Long Acre
which experienced its heyday thanks to the Exhibition. Here the true Central
Committee sat in perpetual session. All other committees, organisations,
party-formations were just trimmings, the patriotic arabesques of this
primeval German tavern society of idlers.
In addition the Emigration was strengthened numerically at the
time by the arrival of Messrs. Meyen, Faucher, Sigel, Goegg and Fickler,
etc.
Meyen was a little porcupine who had come into the world
without any quills and who under the name Poinsinet, was once described
by Goethe in this way:
"In literature, as in society, one often encounters such curious little
mannikins. Endowed with some small talent they endeavour always to claim
the attention of the public and as they can easily be seen through by all
they are the source of much amusement. However, they always manage to profit
sufficiently. They live, produce, are mentioned everywhere and are even
accorded a favourable reception. Their failures do not disconcert them;
they regard them as exceptional and look to the future for greater success.
Poinsinet is a figure of this sort in the French literary world. It goes
almost beyond belief to see what has been done with him, how he has been
fooled and mystified and even his sad death by drowning in Spain does not
diminish the ridiculous impression made by his life, just as a frog made
of fireworks does not attain to dignity by concluding a lengthy series
of sputters with a loud bang." [58]
Writers contemporary with him pass on the following information: Eduard
Meyen belonged to the "Resolute" group which represented the Berliner intelligentsia
as against the mass stupidity of the rest of Germany. He too had a Maybug
Club in Berlin with his friends Mügge, Klein, Zabel, Buhl etc. Each
of these maybugs sat on his own little leaf [Blättchen — "leaf"
and "newspaper"]. Eduard Meyen's paper was called the Mannheimer Abendblättchen
and here, every week, after enormous efforts, he deposited a small green
turd of correspondence. Our Maybug really did progress to the point where
he was about to publish a monthly periodical; contributions from
various people landed on his desk, the publisher waited but the whole project
collapsed because Eduard after eight months in cold sweat declared that
he could not finish the prospectus. As Eduard took all his childish activities
seriously he was widely regarded in Berlin after the March Revolution as
a man who meant business. In London he worked together with Faucher on
a German edition of the Illustrated London News under the editorship
and censorship of an old woman who had known some German twenty years before,
but he was discarded as useless after he had attempted with great tenacity
to insert a profound article about sculpture that he had had published
ten years previously in Berlin. But when, later on, the Kinkel-emigration
made him their secretary he realised that he was really a practical homme
d'état and he announced in a lithographed leaflet that he had
arrived at the "tranquillity of a point of view". After his death a whole
heap of titles for future projects will be found among his papers.
Conjointly with Meyen we must necessarily consider Oppenheim,
his co-editor and co-secretary. It has been claimed that Oppenheim is not
so much a man as an allegorical figure: the goddess of boredom it is reported,
came down to Frankfurt on Main and assumed the shape of this son of a Jewish
jeweller. When Voltaire wrote: "Tous les genres vent loons, excepté
legenre ennuyeux", he must have had a premonition of our Heinrich Bernhard
Oppenheim. We prefer Oppenheim the writer to Oppenheim the orator. His
writings may be avoided, but his spoken delivery — c'est impossible.
The pythagorean metempsychosis may have some foundation in reality but
the name borne by Heinrich Bernhard Oppenheim in former ages can no longer
be discovered as no man ever made a name for himself through being an unbearable
chatterbox. His life may be epitomised by its three climactic moments:
Arnold Ruge's editor — Brentano's editor — Kinkel's editor.
The third member of the trio is Mr. Julius Faucher. He is one
of those Berlin Huguenots who know how to exploit their minor talent with
great commercial adroitness. He made his public debut as the Lieutenant
Pistol of the Free Trade Party in which capacity he was employed by Hamburg
commercial interests to make propaganda. During the revolutionary disturbances
they allowed him to preach free trade in the apparently chaotic form of
anarchism. When this ceased to be relevant to the times he was dismissed
and, together with Meyen, he became joint editor of the Berlin Abendpost.
Under the presence of wishing to abolish the state and introduce anarchy
he refrained from dangerous opposition towards the existing government
and when, later on, the paper failed because it could no longer afford
the deposit, the Neue Preussische Zeitung commiserated with Faucher,
the only able writer among the democrats. This cosy relationship with the
Neue Preussische Zeitung soon became so intimate that Faucher began
to act as its correspondent in London. Faucher's activity in the London
Emigration did not last long; his free trade inclined him towards commerce
where he found his true calling, to which he returned with great energy
and in which he achieved wonders never seen before: namely a price-list
that assesses goods according to a completely sliding scale. As is well
known, the Breslauer Zeitung was indiscreet enough to inform the
general public of this document.
This three-star constellation of the Berlin intelligentsia can
be contrasted with the three-star constellation of wholesome South German
principles: Sigel, Fickler, Goegg. Franz Sigel, whom his friend Goegg describes
as a short, beardless man, bearing a strong resemblance to Napoleon, is,
again according to Goegg, "a hero", "a man of the future", "above all a
genius, intellectually creative and constantly hatching new plans".
Between ourselves, General Siegel is a young Baden lieutenant
of principle and ambition. He read in an account of the campaigns of the
French Revolution that the step from sub-lieutenant to supreme general
is mere child's play and from that moment on this little beardless man
firmly believed that Franz Sigel must become supreme commander in a revolutionary
army. His wish was granted thanks to the Baden insurrection of 1849 and
a popularity with the army arising from a confusion of names. The battles
he fought on the Neckar and did not fight in the Black Forest are well
known; his retreat to Switzerland has been praised even by the enemy as
a timely and correct manoeuvre. His military plans here bear witness to
his study of the [French] Revolutionary Wars. In order to remain
faithful to the revolutionary tradition Hero Sigel, ignoring the
enemy and operational and withdrawal lines and similar bagatelles, went
conscientiously from one Moreau position to the next. And if he did not
manage to parody Moreau's campaigns [59]
in every detail, if he crossed the Rhine at Eglichau and not at Paradies,
this was the fault of the enemy who was too ignorant to appreciate such
a learned manoeuvre. In his orders of the day and in his instructions Sigel
emerges as a preacher and if he has an inferior style to Napoleon, he has
more principle. Later, he concerned himself with devising a handbook for
revolutionary officers in all branches of warfare from which we are in
a position to offer the following important extract:
"an officer of the revolution must carry the following articles according
to regulations: 1 head-covering and cap, 1 sabre with belt, 1 black, red
and yellow [60]
camel-hair sash, 2 pairs of black leather gloves, 2 battle coats, 1 cloak,
1 pair cloth trousers, 1 tie, 2 pairs of boots or shoes, 1 black leather
travelling case — 12" wide, 10" high, 4" deep, 6 shirts, 3 pairs of underpants,
8 pairs of socks, 6 handkerchiefs, 2 towels, 1 washing and shaving kit,
1 writing implement, 1 writing tablet with letters patent, 1 clothes brush,
1 copy of service regulations."
Joseph Fickler —
"the model of a decent, resolute, imperturbably tenacious man of the
people whom the people of the whole Baden upland and the Lake District
supported as one man and whose struggles and sufferings over many years
had earned him a popularity approaching that of Brentano" (according to
the testimony of his friend Goegg).
As befits a decent, resolute, imperturbably tenacious man of the people,
Joseph Fickler has a fleshy full-moon face, a fat craw and a paunch to
match. The only fact known about his early life is that he earned a livelihood
with the aid of a carving from the 15th century and with relics relating
to the Council of Constance. He allowed travellers and foreign art-lovers
to inspect these curiosities in exchange for money and incidentally sold
them "antique" souvenirs of which Fickler, as he loved to relate, would
constantly make up a new supply in all their authentic "antiquity".
His only deeds during the Revolution were firstly his arrest by
Mathy [61]
after the Vorparlament, and, second, his arrest by Romer in Stuttgart in
June 1849. Thanks to these arrests he was happily deprived of the opportunity
to compromise himself. The Württemberg Demm crass deposited 1000 guilders
as bail for him, whereupon Fickler went to Thurgau incognito and to the
great distress of his guarantors no more was heard of him. It is undeniable
that he successfully translated the feelings and opinions of the lakeside
peasants into printers' ink in his Lake journals; for the rest he
shares the opinion of his friend Ruge that much study makes you stupid
and for this reason he warned his friend Goegg not to visit the library
of the British Museum.
Amandus Goegg, lovable, as his name indicates, is no great
orator, but "an unassuming citizen whose noble and modest bearing earns
him the friendship of people everywhere" (Westamerikanische Blätter).
From sheer nobility Goegg became a member of the provisional government
in Baden, where, as he admits, he could do nothing against Brentano and
in all modesty he assumed the title of Dictator. No one denies that his
achievements as Finance Minister were modest. In all modesty he proclaimed
the "Social-democratic Republic" in Donaueschingen the day before the final
retreat to Switzerland actually took place, although it had been decreed
before. In all modesty he later declared (See Janus by Heinzen, 1852) that
the Paris proletariat had lost on December 2 because it did not possess
his own Franco-Badenese democratic experience nor the insights available
elsewhere in the frenchified Germany of the South. Anyone who desires further
proofs of Goegg's modesty and of the existence of a "Goegg Party" will
find them in the book The Baden Revolution in Retrospect. Paris
1850, written by himself. A fitting climax to his modesty came in a public
meeting in Cincinnati when he declared that "reputable men came to him
after the bankruptcy of the Baden Revolution and had announced that in
that revolution men of all the German tribes had taken an active part.
It was therefore to be regarded as a German matter just as the Rome uprising
was of concern to the whole of Italy. As he was the man who had held out
they said that he must become the German Mazzini. His modesty compelled
him to refuse."
Why? A man who was once "dictator" and who to cap it all, is the
bosom friend of "Napoleon" Sigel, could surely also become the "German
Mazzini".
Once the Emigration was augmented by these and similar, less noteworthy
arrivals, it could proceed to those mighty battles that the reader shall
learn of in the next canto.
|