Works of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels 1852
Heroes of the Exile
<"6">
VI
Together with Gustav, Rodomonte Heinzen had arrived
in London from Switzerland. Karl Heinzen had for many years made a living
from his threat to destroy "tyranny" in Germany. After the outbreak of
the February Revolution he went so far as to attempt, with unheard-of courage,
to inspect German soil from the vantage point of Schuster Island [near
Basle]. He then betook himself to Switzerland where from the safety of
Geneva he again thundered against the "tyrants and oppressors of the people"
and took the opportunity to declare that "Kossuth is a great man, but Kossuth
has forgotten about explosive silver". His horror of bloodshed was such
that it turned him into the alchemist of the revolution. He dreamt of an
explosive substance that would blast the whole European reaction into the
air in a trice without its users even getting their fingers burnt. He had
a particular aversion to walking amid a shower of bullets and in general
to conventional warfare in which principles are no defence against bullets.
Under the government of Brentano he risked a revolutionary visit to Karlsruhe.
As he did not receive the reward he thought due to him for his heroic deeds
he resolved to edit the Moniteur [38]
of that "traitor" Brentano. But as the Prussians advanced he declared that
Heinzen would not "let himself be shot" for that traitor Brentano. Under
the pretext of forming an elite corps where political principles and military
organisation would mutually complement each other, i.e. where military
cowardice would pass for political courage, his constant search for the
ideal free corps made him retrace his steps until he had regained the familiar
territory of Switzerland. Sophie's Journey from Memel to Saxony [39]
was a good deal more bloody than Heinzen's revolutionary expedition. On
his arrival in Switzerland he declared that there were no longer any real
men in Germany, that the authentic explosive silver had not yet been discovered,
that the war was not being conducted on revolutionary principles but in
the normal fashion with powder and lead, and that he intended to revolutionise
in Switzerland as Germany was a lost cause. In the secluded idyll of Switzerland
and with the tortured dialect they speak there it was easy for Rodomonte
to pass for a German writer and even for a dangerous man. He achieved his
aim. He was expelled and dispatched to London at Federal expense. Rodomonte
Heinzen had not directly participated in the European revolutions; but,
undeniably, he had moved about extensively on their behalf When the February
Revolution broke out he took up a collection of "revolutionary money" in
New York, hastened to the aid of his country and advanced as far as the
Swiss border. When the March Club's [40]
revolution collapsed he retired from Switzerland to beyond the Channel
at the expense of the Swiss Federal Council. He had the satisfaction of
making the revolution pay for his advance and the counter-revolution for
his retreat.
At every turn in the Italian epics of chivalry we encounter mighty,
broad-shouldered giants armed with colossal staves who despite the fact
that they lash about them wildly and make a frightening din in battle,
never manage to kill their foes but only to destroy the trees in the vicinity.
Mr. Heinzen is such an Ariostian giant in political literature. Endowed
by nature with a churlish figure and huge masses of flesh he interpreted
these gifts to mean that he was destined to be a great man. His weighty
physical appearance determines his whole literary posture which is physical
through and through. His opponents are always small, mere dwarfs, who can
barely reach his ankles and whom he can survey with his kneecap. When,
however, he should indeed make a physical appearance, our uomo membruto
takes refuge in literature or in the courts. Thus scarcely had he reached
the safety of English soil than he wrote a tract on moral courage. Or again,
our giant allowed a certain Mr. Richter to thrash him so frequently and
so thoroughly in New York that the magistrate, who at first only imposed
insignificant fines relented and in recognition of Heinzen's doggedness
he sentenced the dwarf Richter to pay 200 dollars damages. The natural
complement to this great physique so healthy in every fibre is the healthy
commonsense which Heinzen ascribes to himself in the highest possible
degree. It is inevitable that a man with such commonsense will turn out
to be a natural genius who has learnt nothing, a barbarian innocent of
literature and science. By virtue of his commonsense (which he also calls
his "perspicacity" and which allows him to tell Kossuth that he has "advanced
to the extreme frontiers of thought"), he learns only from hearsay or the
newspapers. He is therefore always behind the times and always wears the
coat that literature has cast off some years previously, while rejecting
as immoral and reprehensible the new modern dress he cannot find his way
into. But when he has once assimilated a thing his faith in it is unshakable;
it transforms itself into something that has grown naturally, that is self-evident,
that everyone must immediately agree to and that only malicious, stupid
or sophisticated persons will pretend not to believe. Such a robust body
and healthy commonsense must of course have also some honest, down-to-earth
principles and he even shows to advantage when he takes the craze for principles
to extremes. In this field Heinzen is second to none. He draws attention
to his principles at every opportunity, every argument is met by
an appeal to principle, everyone who fails to understand him or whom he
does not understand is demolished by the argument that he has no real principles,
his insincerity and pure ill-will are such that he would deny that day
was day and night night. To deal with these base disciples of Ahriman he
summons up his muse, indignation; he curses, rages, boasts, preaches, and
foaming at the mouth he roars out the most tragicomical imprecations. He
demonstrates what can be achieved in the field of literary invective by
a man to whom Bome's [41]
wit and literary talent are equally alien. As the muse is, so is the style.
An eternal bludgeon, but a commonplace bludgeon with knots that are not
even original or sharp. Only when he encounters science does he feel momentarily
at a loss. He is then like that Billingsgate fishwife with whom O'Connell
became involved in a shouting match and whom he silenced by replying to
a long string of insults: "You are all that and worse: you are an isosceles
triangle, you are a parallelepiped".
From the earlier history of Mr. Heinzen mention should be made
of the fact that he was in the Dutch colonies where he advanced not indeed
to the rank of general but to that of NCO, a slight for which he later
on always treated the Dutch as a nation without principles. Later we find
him back in Cologne as a sub-inspector of taxes and in this capacity he
wrote a comedy in which his healthy commonsense vainly strove to satirise
the philosophy of Hegel. He was more at home in the gossip columns of the
Kölnische Zeitung, in the feuilleton where he let fall some
weighty words about the quarrels in the Cologne Carnival Club, the institute
from which all the great men of Cologne have graduated. His own sufferings
and those of his father, a forester, in his conflicts with superiors assumed
the proportions of events of universal significance, as easily happens
when the man of healthy commonsense contemplates his little personal problems.
He gives an account of them in his Prussian Bureaucracy, a book
much inferior to Venedey's [42]
and containing nothing more than the complaints of a petty official against
the higher authorities. The book involved him in a trial and although the
worst he had to fear was six months in gaol he thought his head was in
danger and fled to Brussels. From here he demanded that the Prussian government
should not only grant him a safe conduct but also that they should suspend
the whole French legal system and give him a jury trial for an ordinary
offence. The Prussian government issued a warrant for his arrest; he replied
with a "warrant" against the Prussian government which contained inter
alia a sermon on moral resistance and constitutional monarchy and condemned
revolution as immoral and jesuitical. From Brussels he went to Switzerland.
Here, as we saw above, he met Friend Arnold and from him he learnt not
only his philosophy but also a very useful method of self-enrichment. Just
as Arnold sought to assimilate the ideas of his opponents in the course
of polemicising against them, so Heinzen learned to acquire ideas new to
him by reviling them. Hardly had he become an atheist than with all the
zeal of the proselyte he immediately plunged into a furious polemic against
poor old Follen because the latter saw no reason to become an atheist in
his old age. Having had his nose rubbed in the Swiss Federal Republic our
healthy commonsense developed to the point where it desired to introduce
the Federal Republic into Germany too. The same commonsense came to the
conclusion that this could not be done without a revolution and so Heinzen
became a revolutionary. He then began a trade in pamphlets which in the
coarsest tones of the Swiss peasant preached immediate revolution and death
to the rulers from whom all the evils of the world stem. He sought out
committees in Germany who would drum up the cost of printing and distributing
these pamphlets and this led naturally to the growth of a begging industry
on a large scale in the course of which the party workers were first exploited
and then reviled. Old Itzstein could tell a story or two about that. These
pamphlets gave Heinzen a great reputation among itinerant German wine salesmen
who praised him everywhere as a bonny little fighter.
From Switzerland he went to America. Here, although his Swiss
rustic style enabled him to pass as a genuine poet he nevertheless managed
to ride the New York Schnellpost to death in no time at all
Having returned to Europe in the wake of the February revolution
he sent despatches to the Mannheimer Zeitung announcing the arrival
of the great Heinzen and he also published a pamphlet to revenge himself
on Lamartine who together with his whole government had refused to acknowledge
him as an official representative of the American Germans. He still did
not wish to go to Prussia as he still feared for his head despite the March
Revolution and the general amnesty. He would wait until the nation summoned
him. As this did not happen he resolved to stand in absentia for the Hamburg
constituency to the Frankfurt Parliament: his hope was that he would compensate
for being a bad speaker by the loudness of his voice — but he lost the
election.
Arriving in London after the collapse of the Baden uprising he
fell into a rage with the young people who knew nothing of this great man
of before the revolution and of after the revolution, and
who caused him to sink into oblivion. He had always been nothing more than
l'homme de la veille or l'homme du lendemain, he was never
l'homme du jour or even de la journée. As the authentic
exploding silver had still not been discovered new weapons had to be found
to combat the reaction. He called for two million heads so that he could
be a dictator and wade up to the ankles in blood — shed by others. His
real aim was, of course, to create a scandal; the reaction had brought
him to London at its own expense, by means of an expulsion order from England
it would now, so Heinzen hoped, expedite him gratis to New York. The coup
failed and its only consequence was that the radical French papers called
him a fool who shouted for two million heads only because he had never
risked his own. To complete the picture it should be pointed out that his
bloodthirsty article had been published in the Deutsche Londoner Zeitung
owned by the ex-Duke of Brunswick — in return for a cash payment, of course.
Gustav and Heinzen had admired each other for a considerable time.
Heinzen praised Gustav as a sage and Gustav praised Heinzen as a fighter.
Heinzen had scarcely been able to wait for the end of the European revolution
so that he could put an end to the "ruinous disunity in the democratic
German emigration" and to re-open his pre-revolutionary business.
He called for discussion of a draft programme of the German Revolutionary
Party. This programme was distinguished by the invention of a special ministry
"to cater for the all-important need for public playgrounds, battlegrounds"
(minus hail of bullets) "and gardens", and was notable also for the article
abolishing "the privileges of the male sex especially in marriage" (and
also in thrusting maneuvers [Stosstaktik] in war, see Clausewitz). This
programme was actually no more than a diplomatic note from Heinzen to Gustav
as no-one else was clamouring for it. And instead of the hoped for unification
it brought about the immediate separation of the two warriors. Heinzen
had demanded that during the "revolutionary transition period" there should
be a single dictator who would moreover be a Prussian and, to preclude
all misunderstandings, he added: "No soldier can qualify as dictator."
Gustav, on the other hand, argued for a triumvirate comprising two Badeners
and himself Moreover, Gustav found that Heinzen had included in his prematurely
published programme an "idea" stolen from him. This put an end to the second
attempt at unification and Heinzen, denied recognition by the whole world,
receded into obscurity until, in Autumn 1850, he found English soil too
hot for him and sailed off to New York.
<"7">
VII
Gustav and the Colony of Renunciation
After the indefatigable Gustav had made an unsuccessful
attempt to establish a Central Refugee Committee together with Friedrich
Bobzin, Habegg, Oswald, Rosenblum, Cohaheim, Grunich and other "outstanding"
men, he made his way towards Yorkshire. For here, so he believed, a magic
garden would flower and in it, unlike the garden of Alcine, [43]
virtue would rule instead of vice. An old Englishman with a sense of humour
who had been bored by Gustav's theories took him at his word and gave him
a few acres of moor in Yorkshire on the express condition that he would
there found a "colony of renunciation", a colony in which the consumption
of meat, tobacco and spirits would be strictly prohibited, only a vegetarian
diet would be permitted and where every colonist would be obliged to read
a chapter from Struve's book on Constitutional Law at his morning prayers.
Moreover, the colony was to be self-supporting. Accompanied by his Amalia,
by Schnauffer, his Swabian canary and by a few other good men and true,
Gustav placed his trust in God and went to found the "Colony of Renunciation".
Of the colony it must be reported that it contained little prosperity,
much culture and unlimited freedom to be bored and to grow thin. One fine
morning Gustav uncovered a dreadful plot. His companions who did not share
Gustav's ruminant constitution had resolved behind his back to slaughter
the old cow, the only one and one whose milk provided the chief source
of income of the "Colony of Renunciation". Gustav wrung his hands and shed
bitter tears at this betrayal of a fellow creature. He indignantly dissolved
the colony and decided to become a "wet" Quaker [44]
if he were unable to revive the Deutscher Zuschauer or to establish
a "provisional government" in London.
<"8">
VIII
Arnold, who was anything but content in his retreat
in Ostend and who longed for a "frequent appearance" before the public,
heard of Gustav's misfortune. He resolved to return to England at once
and by climbing on Gustav's shoulders, to hoist himself into the pentarchy
of European democracy. For in the meantime the European Central Committee
[45]
had been formed consisting of Mazzini, Ledru-Rollin and Darasz, Mazzini
of course was the soul of the enterprise. Ruge thought he could smell a
vacant position. In his Proscrit Mazzini had indeed introduced General
Ernst Haug, his own invention, as the German associate but for decency's
sake it was not possible to nominate such a completely unknown person onto
the Central Committee. Ruge was not unaware of the fact that Gustav had
had dealings with Mazzini in Switzerland. He himself was acquainted with
Ledru-Rollin but unfortunately Ledru-Rollin was not acquainted with him.
So Arnold took up residence in Brighton and flattered and cajoled the unsuspecting
Gustav, promised to help him found a Deutscher Zuschauer in London
and even to undertake as a joint venture the democratic publication of
the Rotteck-Welcker Lexicon of Politics with Ruge paying the Costs.
At the same time he introduced Gustav as a great man and collaborator into
the local German paper which in accordance with his principles he always
had on tap (this time the blow fell on the Bremer Tages-Chronik
of the nonconformist parson Dulon). One good deed deserves another: Gustav
presented Arnold to Mazzini. As Arnold's French was wholly incomprehensible
there was nothing to prevent him from introducing himself to Mazzini as
the greatest man in Germany and above all as her greatest "thinker". The
canny Italian idealist at once realised that Arnold was the man he was
looking for, the homme sans conséquence who would provide
the German countersignature of his anti-papal Bulls. Thus Arnold Ruge became
the fifth wheel on the state coach of European democracy. When an Alsatian
asked Ledru what on earth possessed him to make an ally of such a bête,
Ledru replied brusquely: "He is Mazzini's man." When Mazzini was asked
why he became involved with Ledru, a man bereft of all ideas, he answered
slyly: "I took him for that very reason." Mazzini himself had every reason
to avoid people with ideas. But Arnold Ruge saw his wildest dreams come
true and for the moment he even forgot Bruno Bauer.
When the time came for him to sign Mazzini's first manifesto he
sadly recalled the days when he had presented himself to Professor Leo
in Halle and old Follen in Switzerland as a Trinitarian on one occasion
and as a humanist atheist on another. This time he had to declare himself
for God and against the princes. However, Arnold's philosophic conscience
had been enfeebled by his association with Dulon and other parsons among
whom he passed for a philosopher. Even in his best days Arnold could not
entirely suppress a certain foible for religion in general and moreover
his "honest consciousness" kept on whispering to him: Sign, Arnold! Paris
vaut bien une messe. One does not become fifth wheel on the coach of the
provisional govemment of Europe in partibus for nothing. Reflect, Arnold!
all you have to do is sign a manifesto every two weeks, and as a member
of the German Parliament, in the company of the greatest men in all Europe.
And bathed in perspiration Arnold signs. A curious joke, he murmurs. Ce
n'est que le premier pas qui coûte. He had copied this last sentence
into his notebook the previous night. However, Arnold had not come to the
end of his trials. The European Central Committee had issued a series of
manifestos to Europe, to the French, the Italians, the Poles and the Wallachians
and now, following the great battle at Bronzell, [46]
it was Germany's turn. In his draft Mazzini attacked the Germans
for their lack of cosmopolitan spirit, and in particular, for their arrogant
treatment of Italian salami vendors, organ-grinders, confectioners, dormouse
tamers and mouse-trap sellers. Taken aback Arnold confessed that it was
true. He went further. He declared his readiness to cede the Austrian Tirol
and Istria to Mazzini. But this was not enough. He had not only to appeal
to the conscience of the German people, but also to attack them where they
were most vulnerable. Arnold received instructions that this time he was
to have an opinion, as he represented the German element. He felt like
the student Jobs. [47]
He scratched himself thoughtfully behind his ear and after long reflection
he stuttered: "Since the age of Tacitus the voices of German bards and
baritones can be heard. In winter they kindle fires on all the mountains
so as to warm their feet." The bards, the baritones and fires on all the
mountains! That will put a bomb under German freedom! thought Mazzini with
a grin. The bards, baritones, fires on all the mountains and German freedom
to boot went into the manifesto as a sop for the German nation. To his
astonishment Arnold had passed the examination and understood for the first
time with what little wisdom the world is governed. From that moment on
he despised Bruno Bauer more than ever for all his eighteen hefty tomes
written while he was still young.
While Arnold in the wake of the European Central Committee was
signing warlike manifestoes with God, for Mazzini and against the
princes, the peace movement was raging not only in England, under
the aegis of Cobden, but even beyond the North Sea. So that in Frankfurt/Main
the Yankee swindler, Elihu Burritt together with Cobden, Jaup, Girardin
and the Red Indian Ka-gi-ga-gi-wa-wa-be-ta organised a Peace Congress.
Our Arnold was just itching to be able to make one of his "frequent appearances"
and to give birth to a manifesto. So he proclaimed himself the corresponding
member of the Frankfurt Assembly and sent over an extremely confused Peace
Manifesto translated out of Cobden's speeches into his own speculative
Pomeranian. Various Germans drew Arnold's attention to the contradiction
between his warlike attitude in the Central Committee and his peaceful
Quakerism. He would reply: "Well, there you have the contradictions. That's
the dialectic for you. In my youth I studied Hegel." His "honest consciousness"
was eased by the thought that Mazzini knew no German and that it was not
hard to pull the wool over his eyes.
Moreover, his relationship with Mazzini promised to become even
more secure thanks to the protection of Harro Harring who had just
landed in Hull. For with Harring a new and highly symptomatic character
steps onto the stage.
<"9">
IX
The great drama of the democratic emigration of 1848-52
had been preceded by a prelude eighteen years previously: the democratic
emigration of 1830-31. Even though with the passage of time most of the
players had disappeared from the stage there still remained a few noble
ruins who, stoically indifferent to the course of history and their own
lack of success, continued their activities as agitators, devised comprehensive
plans, formed provisional governments and hurled proclamations into the
world in every direction. It is obvious that these experienced swindlers
were infinitely superior to the younger generation in business know-how.
It was this very know-how acquired through eighteen years practice in conspiring,
scheming, intriguing, proclaiming, duping, showing off and pushing oneself
to the fore that gave Mr. Mazzini the cheek and the assurance to install
himself as the Central Committee of European democracy supported only by
three straw men of much smaller experience in such matters.
No one was more favoured by circumstances to become the very type
of the émigré agitator than our friend Harro Harring.
And indeed he did become the prototype whom all our heroes of the Exile,
all the Arnolds, Gustavs and Gottfrieds strove more or less consciously
and with varying success to emulate. They may even equal him if circumstances
are not unfavourable, but they will hardly surpass him.
Harro who like Caesar has himself described his own great deeds
(London 1852) was born on the "Cimbrian peninsula" and belongs to that
visionary North Frisian race which has already been shown by Dr. Clement
to have produced all the great nations of the world.
"Already in early youth" he attempted to "set the seal of action
upon his enthusiasm for the cause of the peoples" by going to Greece
in 1821. We see how Friend Harro had an early premonition of his mission
to be everywhere where confusion reigned. Later on "a strange fate led
him to the source of absolutism, to the vicinity of the Czar and he had
seen through theJesuitism of constitutional monarchy in Poland".
So Harro fought for freedom in Poland also. But "the crisis in
the history of Europe following the fall of Warsaw greatly perplexed him",
and his perplexity led him to the idea of "the democracy of nations", which
he at once "documented in the work: The Nations, Strasbourg, March
1832". It is worth remarking that this work was almost quoted at the Hambacher
Fest. [48]
At the same time he published his "republican poems: Blutstropfen
[Drops of Blood]; The History of King Saul or the Monarchy; Male voices
on Germany's Freedom" and edited the journal Deutschland in
Strasbourg. All these and even his future writings had the unexpected good
fortune to be banned by the Federal Diet on November 4, 1831. This was
the only thing he still lacked, only now did he achieve real importance
and also the martyr's crown. So that he could exclaim "My writings were
everywhere well received and echoed loudly in the hearts of the people.
They were mostly distributed gratis. In the case of some of them I did
not even receive enough to cover the Costs of printing."
But new honours still awaited him. In 1831 Mr. Welcker had vainly
attempted in a long letter "to convert him to the vertical horizon
of constitutional monarchy". And now, in January 1832, there came a visit
from Mr. Malten, a well-known Prussian agent abroad, who proposed that
he should enter Prussian service. What double recognition this was — and
from the enemy too! Enough, Malten's offer "triggered off the idea that
in the face of this dynastic treachery he should give birth to the
concept of Scandinavian nationality", and "from that time on at least the
word Scandinavia was reborn after having been forgotten for centuries".
In this manner our North Frisian from South Jutland who did not
know himself whether he was a German or a Dane acquired at least an imaginary
nationality whose first consequence was that the men of Hambach would have
nothing to do with him.
With all these events behind him Harro's fortune was made. Veteran
of freedom in Greece and Poland, the inventor of "democracy of nations",
re-discoverer of the word "Scandinavia", poet acknowledged by the ban of
the Federal Diet, thinker and journalist, martyr, a great man esteemed
even by his enemies, a man whose allegiance constitutionalists, absolutists
and republicans vied with each other to possess and, with all that, empty-headed
and confused enough to believe in his own greatness — what then was needed
to make his happiness complete? But Harro was a conscientious man and as
his fame grew so did the demands which he made upon himself What was missing
was a great work that would present in an entertaining and popular form
the great doctrines of freedom, the idea of democracy, and of nationality
and all the sublime struggles for freedom on the part of the youthful Europe
arising before his very eyes. None but a poet and thinker of the very first
rank could produce such a work and none but Harro could be this man. Thus
arose the first three plays of the "dramatic cycle" The People,
of which there were twelve parts in all, one of them in Danish, a labour
to which the author devoted ten years of his life. Unfortunately eleven
of these twelve parts have "hitherto remained in manuscript".
However, this dallying with the muse was not to last forever.
"In the winter of 1832-1833 a movement was prepared in Germany — which was brought to a tragic end in the skirmish in Frankfurt. I was entrusted
with the task of taking the fortress (?) in Kehl on the night of 6 April.
Men and weapons were at the ready."
Unfortunately it all came to nothing and Harro had to retire to the depths
of France where he wrote his Words of a Man. From there he was summoned
to Switzerland by the Poles arming themselves for their march on Savoy.
Here he became "attached to their General Staff", wrote a further two parts
of his dramatic cycle The People, and made the acquaintance of Mazzini
in Geneva. The whole band of fire-eaters consisting of Polish, French,
German, Italian and Swiss adventurers under the command of the noble Ramorino
then made their famous attack on Savoy. [49]
In this campaign our Harro "discovered the value of his life and strength".
But as the other freedom fighters felt "the value of their lives" no less
than Harro and no doubt had just as few illusions about their "strength"
the exploit ended badly and they returned to Switzerland beaten, dishevelled
and in disarray.
This campaign was all that was needed to give our band of emigrant
knights a complete insight into the terror they inspired in the tyrants.
As long as the aftermath of the July Revolution could still be felt in
isolated insurrections in France, Germany or Italy, as long as they felt
someone or other standing behind them our émigré heroes
felt themselves to be but atoms in the seething masses — more or
less privileged, prominent atoms, to be sure, but in the last analysis
they were still atoms. But as these insurrections gradually grew feebler,
as the great mass of "lackeys", of the "half-hearted" and the "men of little
faith" retired from the putschist swindles and as our knights felt increasingly
lonely, so did their self-esteem grow in proportion. If the whole of Europe
became craven, stupid and selfish, how could our trusty heroes fail to
grow in their own estimation, for were they not the priests who kept the
sacred fires of hatred for all tyrants burning in their breasts and who
maintained the traditions of virtue and love of freedom for a more vigorous
generation yet to come! If they too deserted the flag the tyrants would
be safe for ever. So like the democrats of 1848 they saw in every defeat
a guarantee of future victory and they gradually transformed themselves
more and more into itinerant Don Quixotes with dubious sources of income.
Once arrived at this point they could plan their greatest act of heroism,
the foundation of "Young Europe" whose Charter of Brotherhood was drawn
up by Mazzini and signed in Berne on 15 April 1834. Harro appears in it
as
"initiator of the Central Committee, adoptive member of Young Germany
and Young Italy and also as representative of the Scandinavian branch"
which he "still represents today".
The date of the Charter of Brotherhood marks for Harro the great epoch
from which calculations are made forwards and backwards, thus replacing
the birth of Christ. It is the highpoint of his life. He was co-dictator
of Europe in partibus and although the world knew nothing of him he was
one of the most dangerous men alive. No one stood behind him but his many
unpublished works, a few German artisans in Switzerland and a dozen political
speculators who had seen better days — but for that very reason he could
claim that all the people of the world were on his side. For it is the
fate of all great men not to be recognised by their own age whereas the
future belongs to them. And Harro had taken care of the future — he had
it in black and white in his bag in the form of the Charter of Brotherhood.
But now began Harro's decline. His first sorrow was that "Young
Germany split off from Young Europe in 1836". But Germany was duly punished
for that. Because of the split "nothing had been prepared for a
national movement in Germany early in 1848" and this is why everything
ended so miserably.
But a much greater sorrow for Harro was the growth of communism.
We learn from him that the founder of communism was none other than
"the cynic Johannes Müller from Berlin, the author of a very interesting pamphlet on Prussian policy, Altenburg 1831". Müller went to England
where "the only available opening for him was in Smith field Market where
he had to tend swine at the crack of dawn".
Communism soon began to spread among the German artisans in France and
Switzerland and it became a very dangerous enemy for Harro as it cut off
the only market for his writings. This was due to the "indirect censorship
of communism" from which poor Harro has suffered to this very day and indeed
it is now worse than ever as he sadly confesses and "as the fate
of my drama The Dynasty proves". This indirect communist censorship
even succeeded in expelling Harro from Europe and so he went to Rio de
Janeiro (in 1840) where he lived for a time as a painter. "Using his time
conscientiously here as everywhere" he brought out a new work: "Poems
of a Scandinavian (2000 copies) which has been distributed so widely
among sea-faring people as to have become an oceanic best-seller".
However, his "scrupulous sense of obligation towards Young Europe"
unfortunately led him to return to the Old World.
He "hastened to Mazzini in London and soon perceived the danger
that threatened the cause of the peoples from communism".
New deeds awaited him. The Bandiera brothers [50]
were preparing for their expedition to Italy. To support them and
to divert the forces of despotism Harro "returned to South America where
in union with Garibaldi he dedicated himself to furthering the idea of
a United States of South America".
But the despots had got wind of his mission and Harro took to
his heels. He sailed to New York.
"During the voyage I was very active intellectually and wrote among
other things a drama: The Power of Ideas, which belonged to the
dramatic cycle The People — this too has remained in MS. up to
now!"
From South America he brought with him to New York a programme from a group
alleged to be affiliated with Humanidad.
The news of the February Revolution inspired him to produce a
pamphlet in French, La France réveillée and while
embarking for Europe "I documented my love for my country once again in
some poems, Scandinavia".
He went to Schleswig-Holstein. Here, after an absence of twentyseven
years, he "discovered an unheard of conceptual confusion in the sphere
of international law, democracy, republicanism socialism and communism,
a chaos which lay like rotting hay and straw in the Augean stables of party
factions and national hatred".
No wonder, for his "political writings" like his "whole striving
and activities since 1831 had remained alien and unknown in those frontier
provinces of my home country".
The Augustenburg Party [51]
had suppressed him for eighteen years by means of a conspiracy of silence.
To deal with this he girt on a sabre, a rifle, four pistols and six daggers
and called for the formation of a free corps, but in vain. After various
adventures he finally arrived in Hull. Here he hastened to issue two circulars
to the peoples of Schleswig-Holstein, Scandinavia and Germany and even
sent a note, as has been reported, to two communists in London with this
message: "Five thousand workers in Norway send you fraternal greetings
through me.
Despite this curious appeal he soon became a sleeping partner
of the European Central Committee again, thanks to the Charter of Brotherhood,
and he also became "nigh/watchman and employee of a young firm of brokers
in Gravesend on the Thames where my task was to drum up trade among ships'
captains in nine different languages until I was accused of fraud, a thing
which the philosopher Johannes Müller was at least spared in his capacity
as swineherd".
Harro summarised his action-packed life as follows:
"It can easily be calculated that apart from my poems I have given
away more than 18,000 copies of my writings in German (varying from 10
shillings to 3 Marks in price, and hence amounting to around 25,000 Marks
in toto) to the democratic movement. I have never even been reimbursed
for the printing costs, let alone received any profit for myself."
With this we bring the adventures of our demagogic Hidalgo from the South
Jutland Mancha to a close. In Greece and Brazil, on the Vistula and La
Plata, in Schleswig-Holstein and in New York, in London and in Switzerland:
the representative of Young Europe and of the South American Humanidad,
painter, nightwatchman and employee, peddler of his own writings; among
Poles one day and gauchos the next, and ship's captains the day after that;
unacknowledged, abandoned, ignored but everywhere an itinerant knight of
freedom with a thoroughgoing dislike of ordinary bourgeois hard work —
our hero at all times in all countries and in all circumstances remains
himself; with the same confusion, the same meddlesome pretensions, the
same faith in himself He will always defy the world and never cease to
say, write and print that since 1831 he has been the mainspring of world
history.
|