Peter Whitewood
Abstract
Stalin’s purge of his military elite during 1937–1938 is one
of the most unusual events of the Great Terror.
Why would Stalin execute his most qualified officers at the
same time as defence spending was rising and a world war was
approaching? This article argues that a long history of the
Red Army being perceived as vulnerable to subversion is
central to understanding this military purge. When faced
with perceived plots in the military Stalin tended to lean
towards restraint, but by 1937 he felt he could no longer
hesitate, and finally cracked down on what he saw as a
compromised army.
During 1937 and 1938 Stalin purged his military, leading to
the expulsion and execution of thousands of experienced
officers. This purge began in June 1937 with a closed
military trial of Mikhail Tukhachevskii and other senior
officers, charged with membership of a ‘Military–Fascist
Plot’.(1) Striking out at the military elite when war was
approaching was dangerous. In destroying his officer corps
at a time of international crisis, Stalin risked fighting a
costly war with a decapitated army. As such, the military
purge is difficult to reconcile with the common argument
that Stalin attacked the army elite to further consolidate
his power.(2) Indeed, to explain such an action as the
military purge requires an understanding of why Stalin
thought this was necessary, and that to do nothing was not
worth the risk. Stalin would only take action against the
army if he perceived it to be a threat and when he felt
compelled to act. Starting from the Civil War, this article
will argue that a long history of perceived threats to the
Red Army from ‘military specialists’, the ‘Trotskyist
Opposition’ and foreign agents undermined Stalin’s trust in
his military. Yet, Stalin consistently leaned towards
restraint and resisted a serious crackdown to improve army
security. But in the face of a large spy scare in 1937
Stalin was forced to change his approach and was finally
compelled to move against the army elite, taking drastic
action which he saw as unavoidable.
Next; Army
subversion in the Civil War and the 1920s
Operation vesna and the growing espionage threat
The arrest of the ‘Trotskyist Military Centre’
Operation vesna and the growing espionage threat
(1)The other defendants included Iona Yakir, Ieronim
Uborevich, Boris Feldman, Avgust Kork, Robert Eideman,
Vitovt Putna and Vasily Primakov.
(2)That Stalin purged the Red Army in order to
consolidate his power is an argument that dominated the
post-war literature on the Soviet military and the Great
Terror. For instance, in his influential work on the Red
Army, John Erickson argued that by purging the military
Stalin ‘rid himself of the last potential source of
leadership that could rival his own’ (Erickson 1962, p.
465). Similarly, Robert Conquest argued that Stalin
attacked the army to remove any possibility of a
military coup (Conquest 1968, pp. 201–35). This
explanation of the military purge can still be seen in
more recent work (Tucker 1990; Nichols 1990; Ziemke
2004).
EUROPE-ASIA STUDIES
Vol. 67, No. 1, January 2015, 102–122
ISSN 0966-8136 print; ISSN 1465-3427 online/15/100102–21
q 2015 University of Glasgow
Papers published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)
http://www.tandfonline.com/terms-and-conditions